UCLA-Led Team Finds Lingering Effects of Neanderthal DNA in Modern Humans

Study shows continued genetic impact in some characteristics, but overall effect is waning

Introgression

Zehui Chen/Chinese Academy of Sciences and April (Xinzhu) Wei/Cornell University
An illustration showing the continued, albeit waning, influence of Neanderthal DNA in modern humans

Jun 2, 2023

UCLA Samueli Newsroom

Recent scientific discoveries have shown that Neanderthal genes comprise some 1 to 4% of the genome of modern non-Africans, but the question remained open on how much those genes are still actively influencing human traits — until now.

A multi-institution research team led by Sriram Sankararaman — a UCLA associate professor of computer science, human genetics and computational medicine — has developed a new suite of computational genetic tools to address the genetic effects of interbreeding between non-African humans and Neanderthals that took place some 50,000 years ago.

In a study published in eLife, the researchers discovered that some Neanderthal genes are responsible for certain traits in modern humans, including several with a significant influence on the immune system. Overall, however, the study shows that modern human genes are winning out over successive generations. 

“For scientists studying human evolution interested in understanding how interbreeding with archaic humans tens of thousands of years ago still shapes the biology of many present-day humans, this study can fill in some of those blanks,” Sankararaman said. “More broadly, our findings can also provide new insights for evolutionary biologists looking at how the echoes of these types of events may have both beneficial and detrimental consequences.”

 Using a vast dataset from the UK Biobank consisting of genetic and trait information of nearly 300,000 non-African Brits, the researchers analyzed more than 235,000 genetic variants likely to have originated from Neanderthals. They found that 4,303 of those differences in DNA are playing a substantial role in modern humans and influencing 47 distinct genetic traits, such as how fast someone can burn calories or a person’s natural immune resistance to certain diseases.

“For scientists studying human evolution interested in understanding how interbreeding with archaic humans tens of thousands of years ago still shapes the biology of many present-day humans, this study can fill in some of those blanks,” Sriram Sankararaman said.

Unlike previous studies that could not fully exclude genes from modern human variants, the new study leveraged more precise statistical methods to focus on the variants attributable to Neanderthal genes.

“Interestingly, we found that several of the identified genes involved in modern human immune, metabolic and developmental systems might have influenced human evolution after the ancestors’ migration out of Africa,” said study co-lead author April (Xinzhu) Wei, an assistant professor of computational biology at Cornell University in New York. “We have made our custom software available for free download and use by anyone interested in further research.”

While the study used a dataset of almost exclusively white individuals living in the United Kingdom, the new computational methods developed by the team could offer a path forward in gleaning evolutionary insights from other large databases to delve deeper into archaic humans’ genetic influences on modern humans. 

The other co-lead author on the study is Christopher Robles, a former UCLA doctoral student in genetics and genomics advised by Sankararaman. 

Additional authors are Sankararaman’s doctoral student Ali Pazokitoroudi, Andrea Ganna of Massachusetts General Hospital and the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Alexander Gusev and Arun Durvasula of Harvard Medical School, Steven Gazal of USC, Po-Ru Loh of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, and David Reich of Harvard University. 

The research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation, with additional funding from an Alfred P Sloan Research Fellowship and a gift from the Okawa Foundation. Other authors received funding support from the Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group, the John Templeton Foundation, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Burroughs Wellcome Fund and the Next Generation Fund at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.

Share this article